- Form a Company Now! +
- Services +
- Compare Prices +
- Learning Center +
- HBS Blog +
- Make Payments +
Did you see Harvard Business Services, Inc. in the January 30th edition of The Washington Post Magazine? If you missed it, here is what you need to know, plus a link to check out the original story. Written by New York Journalist David Walter, “Money is Never Just Money” features Harvard as a case study. The article was also published in the San Francisco Gate under the title, “Measuring the Impact of a Bonus” and in the Los Angeles Times, the next day under yet another title.
Featuring our founder, Rick Bell and several Harvard employees, the story focuses on bonuses awarded as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Walter begins the piece by asking the question: what is the impact of these bonuses? Then he hones in on Harvard as a case study. Walter describes what he calls our founder’s ‘labor relations strategy,’ “when Bell became boss of his own company, his labor relations strategy centered on flexible hours, vacation days, and lots and lots of bonuses.”
In an accurate assessment, Walter contrasts Bell’s experience at Rolling Stone Magazine to the ‘labor relations strategy’ he developed once he owned his own company. Seven compelling cameos of Harvard employees also make up this section in which they describe how they spent their Tax Cuts and Job Act bonus. Walter hits it out of the park in this section. For any entrepreneur who has ever questioned the real value of a bonus, we highly recommend checking this part out.
At the end of the article, Walter asks whether or not the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act bonuses is ultimately beneficial—for businesses, individuals, society and government. Relying on Nicholas Epley at the University of Chicago to provide the perspective of a behavioral scientist, the answer suggested is that bonuses are not beneficial for society and employees when they are offered as a substitute for wages being ‘raised to a stable level.’
Fittingly, the kind of questions Harvard asks itself are more specific: What is the impact of this bonus when employees take home salaries that are well above a ‘stable level,’ in addition to 100% health insurance coverage, dental, eye care, profit sharing, paid time off, paid maternity leave, childcare reimbursement and tuition reimbursement? Further, what is the impact of this bonus when employees receive regular bonuses?
We aren’t behavioral scientists, but we think the impact of one bonus related to tax cuts (in the context of a fair, even generous compensation package) is that it gives our employees one more reason to take pride in coming to work every day and to choose to work at Harvard Business Services for the long-term. Our employees know their contributions are valued, their hard work is acknowledged and that they participate in the company’s success. At HBS, a bonus is not a substitute for something vital. It is just what it says it is: a reward for excellent performance.
Walter, David. “Money Is Never Just Money.” The Washington Post Magazine. The Washington Post. January 30, 2019.
*Disclaimer*: Harvard Business Services, Inc. is neither a law firm nor an accounting firm and, even in cases where the author is an attorney, or a tax professional, nothing in this article constitutes legal or tax advice. This article provides general commentary on, and analysis of, the subject addressed. We strongly advise that you consult an attorney or tax professional to receive legal or tax guidance tailored to your specific circumstances. Any action taken or not taken based on this article is at your own risk. If an article cites or provides a link to third-party sources or websites, Harvard Business Services, Inc. is not responsible for and makes no representations regarding such source’s content or accuracy. Opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of Harvard Business Services, Inc.